Impact of intra- and extramedullary alignment on blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of scientific data regarding the correlation between alignment techniques during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and blood loss as well as transfusion rates. This study's hypothesis posited that intramedullary-aligned (IM) TKA exhibits higher blood loss and transfusion rates when contrasted with extramedullary-aligned (EM) TKA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective examination of 883 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in 2021 at a solitary orthopedic center in Germany. These patients were divided into two groups based on their tibial alignment technique: extramedullary alignment and intramedullary tibial alignment. RESULTS: In the intramedullary tibial alignment (IM) group, we observed a blood loss of 0.91 L, while in the extramedullary tibial alignment (EM) group, the blood loss was 0.89 L. These values did not demonstrate a significant difference (p = 0.69). Transfusion rates were 0.99% in the IM group and 0.21% in the EM group, and there was no significant distinction between them (Chi-squared test: p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We observed no statistically significant variance in blood loss between the IM and EM groups. Likewise, there was no substantial disparity in transfusion rates between these groups. It can be concluded that the selection of a knee arthroplasty system incorporating either intramedullary tibial alignment or extramedullary alignment does not significantly impact blood loss.

Current Trends in Orthopaedics and Trauma in Germany.

During the Guest Nation Symposium (cobranded with the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie) at the 2023 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Congress in Las Vegas, the goal was to compile nationally important content from German orthopaedics and trauma surgery. This resulted in a mix of content on the latest developments in trauma care, knee arthroplasty, spinopelvic importance for hip arthroplasty, stemless shoulder endoprostheses, joint preservation for ankle osteoarthritis, trauma education, and research. Of course, this is only a small selection of the important issues that are being driven forward in Germany.

Predicting whether patients will achieve minimal clinically important differences following hip or knee arthroplasty.

Aims: A substantial fraction of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty (KA) or hip arthroplasty (HA) do not achieve an improvement as high as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), i.e. do not achieve a meaningful improvement. Using three patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), our aim was: 1) to assess machine learning (ML), the simple pre-surgery PROM score, and logistic-regression (LR)-derived performance in their prediction of whether patients undergoing HA or KA achieve an improvement as high or higher than a calculated MCID; and 2) to test whether ML is able to outperform LR or pre-surgery PROM scores in predictive performance. Methods: MCIDs were derived using the change difference method in a sample of 1,843 HA and 1,546 KA patients. An artificial neural network, a gradient boosting machine, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, ridge regression, elastic net, random forest, LR, and pre-surgery PROM scores were applied to predict MCID for the following PROMs: EuroQol five-dimension, five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (KOOS-PS). Results: Predictive performance of the best models per outcome ranged from 0.71 for HOOS-PS to 0.84 for EQ-VAS (HA sample). ML statistically significantly outperformed LR and pre-surgery PROM scores in two out of six cases. Conclusion: MCIDs can be predicted with reasonable performance. ML was able to outperform traditional methods, although only in a minority of cases.

Cemented and hybrid total hip arthroplasty lead to lower blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Little scientific evidence exists on blood loss and transfusion rates depending on the fixation technique. The hypothesis of this study was that the blood loss and transfusion rate are lower in cemented and hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to cementless THA. METHODS: We retrospectively compared a total of 1500 patients who received either cementless, cemented, hybrid or reverse hybrid THA. All patients underwent THA in 2021 at a single orthopedic center in Germany. RESULTS: The lowest blood loss was found in patients who received a fully cemented THA (695 ± 74 ml). Hybrid THA with a cemented stem showed a blood loss of 845 ± 30 ml and reverse hybrid THA showed the highest blood loss with an average of 994 ± 74 ml. Cementless THA caused an average blood loss of 957 ± 16 ml. There was a significant difference between cementless THA, hybrid THA (cemented stem), and fully cemented THA (p < 0.05). Transfusion rates ranged from 1.3% (cementless THA) to 7.9% (cemented THA) between the groups with a transfusion rate of 2.5% overall. CONCLUSION: We found significantly lower blood loss in cemented THA and hybrid THA compared to cementless THA. Although blood loss was lower in cemented and hybrid THA, this did not result in lower transfusion rates. This could be due to other confounders such as age, comorbidities, and preoperative anemia.

Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is accurate in vivo: a retrospective study to measure the postoperative bone resection and alignment.

PURPOSE: Conventional instruments for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have limited accuracy. The occurrence of outliers can negatively influence the clinical outcome and long-term survival of the implant. Orthopaedic robotic systems were developed to increase the accuracy of implant positioning and bone resections. Several systems requiring preoperative imaging have shown a higher degree of precision compared to conventional instrumentation. An imageless system needs less preoperative time and preparation and is more cost effective. Aim of this study was to find out whether this system is as precise, reproduces accurately the surgeon's planning and reduces the occurrence of outliers. METHODS: This retrospective study included the first 71 robotic-assisted TKA and 308 conventional TKA in 374 patients. Intraoperatively planned and actual bone resections were compared. Postoperative alignment, measured on full leg weight bearing radiographs, was related to the respective planning and statistically compared between the groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics (age, BMI, ASA, preoperative Knee Society Score and deformity) between both groups were comparable. According to the planned alignment, the postoperative mean difference was - 1.01° in the robotic versus 2.05° in the conventional group. The maximum deviation was - 2/+ 2.5° in the robotic and - 6.6/ + 6.8° in the conventional group. According to the plan, there were no outliers above ± 3° in the robotic versus 24% in the conventional group. The mean difference between planned and measured bone resection was 0.21 mm with a maximum of 2 mm. The 95% confidence interval was at each position 1 mm or below. CONCLUSIONS: The described imageless robotic system is accurate in terms of coronal alignment and bone resections. In precision, it is superior to conventional instrumentation and could therefore be used to evaluate new alignment concepts.

Blood transfusion and venous thromboembolism trends and risk factors in primary and aseptic revision total hip and knee arthroplasties: A nationwide investigation of 736,061 cases.

BACKGROUND: Over the last years, new transfusion guidelines and pharmaceuticals have been introduced in primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (P-THA, P-TKA, R-THA, R-TKA). In the US, a substantial decrease in transfusions has been observed in recent years. Little data exists on the subject in Europe. In this context we aimed to analyze: (1) Is there also a significant decrease in blood transfusion for these procedures in Germany? (2) Which patient and hospital related factors are associated with the risk of blood transfusion? (3) Is there a trend in complications, especially venous thromboembolism and stroke events that can be linked to tranexamic acid use? HYPOTHESIS: There is a significant trend in decreasing blood transfusions in hip and knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Using nationwide healthcare insurance data for inpatient hospital treatment, 736,061 cases treated between January 2011 and December 2017 were included (318,997 P-THAs, 43,780 R-THAs, 338,641 P-TKAs, 34,643 R-TKAs). Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of transfusion as a function of the year of surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: In each cohort the odds of transfusion decreased over time (2017 vs. 2011 (reference): P-THA: OR 0.42 (95%CI: 0.39-0.45), P-TKA: OR 0.41 (95%CI: 0.37-0.46), R-THA: OR 0.52 (95%CI: 0.47-0.58), R-TKA: OR 0.53 (95%CI: 0.46-0.61). Patient-related risk factors for blood transfusion included older age, female gender, lower Body Mass Index, comorbidities such as renal failure, cardiac arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular disease, coagulopathy, depression, and antithrombotic medication prior to surgery. Venous thromboembolism or stroke events did not increase over the study period. DISCUSSION: The incidence of blood transfusions in primary and revision TKA and THA decreased over the study period. This may be due to new transfusion guidelines and the introduction of novel pharmaceuticals such as tranexamic acid. A further improved patient blood management and a focus on vulnerable patient groups might lead to a further future reduction of transfusions, especially in R-THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; comparative observational study.

Time to Surgery and Outcome in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures.

BACKGROUND: It has not been conclusively established whether, or to what extent, the time to surgery affects mortality and the risk of complications after the surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures. METHODS: Data on 106 187 hospitalizations over the period 2015-2017 involving insurees of the German AOK health insurance company aged 20 and above were drawn from pseudonymized billing data and stratified in three subgroups: osteosynthesis for pertrochanteric fracture (PTF-OS: N = 52 358), osteosynthesis for femoral neck fracture (FNF-OS: N = 7970), and endoprosthesis for femoral neck fracture (FNF-EP: N = 45 859). Multivariate regression models were used to analyze the relation between preoperative in-hospital stay (time to surgery, TTS: 0 days [reference category], 1, 2, 3, 4-7 days) and mortality and general complications within 90 days, with risk adjustment for fracture site, operative method, age, sex, accompanying illnesses, and antithrombotic medication in the preceding year. RESULTS: Mortality was significantly elevated only with PTF-OS, and only with a TTS of 2 days (odds ratio: 1.12 [95% confidence interval: (1.02; 1.23)]). General complications in relation to TTS were significantly elevated in the following situations: PTF-OS: 2 days: OR 1.24 [1.13; 1.37], 3 days: OR 1.33 [1.11; 1.60], 4-7 days: OR 1.47 [1.21; 1.78]; FNF-EP: 3 days: OR 1.21 [1.06; 1.37], 4-7 days: OR 1.42 [1.25; 1.62]; FNF-OS: 4-7 days: OR 1.86 [1.26; 2.73]. CONCLUSION: A prolonged time to surgery is associated with an elevated general complication risk depending on the site of the fracture and the type of surgical procedure used.

No Major Functional Benefit After Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty at 5-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: In case of isolated medial and patellofemoral joint arthritis, bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BCA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our prospective, randomized study is to compare the clinical outcome of BCA vs TKA. METHODS: Eighty patients with isolated medial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either BCA or TKA. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months, and 2 and 5 years after the procedure. Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and the University of California,Los Angeles activity scores were calculated at each follow-up; Forgotten Joint Score was assessed at final follow-up. RESULTS: There was an improvement in Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and the University of California,Los Angeles scores in both groups but no significant differences between both groups at any follow-up. The Forgotten Joint Score at 5-year follow-up was not significantly different either. Range of motion was significantly greater in the BCA group from 1-year follow-up onward. CONCLUSION: Our study did not show significant differences in clinical scores between BCA and TKA; only range of motion was significantly greater in BCA. Therefore, it is questionable whether this difference justifies the complexity of BCA associated with higher risk of failure. Maybe staged patellofemoral joint arthroplasty in the presence of a well-functioning UKA is an option for BCA and an alternative to revision to TKA. Long-term studies are needed to explore the potential benefits of BCA.

Low Hospital Volume Increases Re-Revision Rate Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 23,644 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Along with rising numbers of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the number of revision total knee arthroplasties (R-TKAs) has been increasing. R-TKA is a complex procedure requiring special instruments, implants, and surgical skills. Therefore it is likely that hospitals with more R-TKAs have more experience with this type of surgery and therefore fewer complications. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between hospital volume and re-revision rate following R-TKA. METHODS: Using nationwide healthcare insurance data for inpatient hospital treatment, 23,644 aseptic R-TKAs in 21,573 patients treated between January 2013 and December 2017 were analyzed. Outcomes were 90-day mortality, 1-year re-revision rate, and in-house adverse events. The effect of hospital volumes on outcomes were analyzed by means of multivariate logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Hospital volume had a significant effect on 1-year re-revision rate (≤12 R-TKA/a: OR 1.44, CI 1.20-1.72; 13-24 R-TKA/a: OR 1.43, CI 1.20-1.71; 25-52 R-TKA/a: OR 1.13, CI 0.94-1.35; ≥53 R-TKA/a: reference). Ninety-day mortality and major in-house adverse events decreased with increasing volume per year, but after risk adjustment this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: We found evidence of higher risk for re-revision surgery in hospitals with fewer than 25 R-TKA per year. It might contribute to improved patient care if complex elective procedures like R-TKA which require experience and a specific logistic background were performed in specialized centers.

Low Hospital Volume Increases Revision Rate and Mortality Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 17,773 Cases.

BACKGROUND: With the number of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), the amount of revision THA (R-THA) increases. R-THA is a complex procedure requiring special instruments, implants, and surgical skills. Therefore it is likely that hospitals performing a higher number of R-THAs have more experience with this type of surgery and therefore fewer complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between hospital volume and risk of postoperative complications following R-THA. METHODS: Using nationwide healthcare insurance data for inpatient hospital treatment, 17,773 aseptic R-THAs in 16,376 patients treated between January 2014 and December 2016 were included. Outcomes were 90-day mortality, 1-year revision procedures, and in-house adverse events. The effect of hospital volume on outcome was analyzed by means of multivariate logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Hospital volume had a significant effect on 90-day mortality (≤12 cases per year: OR 2.13, CI 1.53-2.96; 13-24: OR 1.79, CI 1.29-2.50; 25-52: OR 1.53, CI 1.11-2.10; ≥53: reference) and 1-year revision procedures (≤12: OR 1.26, CI 1.09-1.47; 13-24: OR 1.18, CI 1.02-1.37; 25-52: OR 1.03, CI 0.90-1.19; ≥53: reference). There was no significant effect on risk-adjusted major in-house adverse events. CONCLUSION: We found evidence of higher risk for revision surgery and mortality in hospitals with fewer than 25 and 53 R-THA per year, respectively. To improve patient care, complex elective procedures like R-THA which require experience and a specific logistic background should be performed in specialized centers.

Obesity Increases the Risk of Postoperative Complications and Revision Rates Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 131,576 Total Hip Arthroplasty Cases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) and the risk of postoperative complications, mortality, and revision rates following primary total hip arthroplasty given other potentially confounding patient characteristics in a large cohort study. METHODS: Using nationwide billing data for inpatient hospital treatment of the biggest German healthcare insurance, 131,576 total hip arthroplasties in 124,368 patients between January 2012 and December 2014 were included. Outcomes were 90-day mortality, 1-year revision procedures (with and without removal or exchange of implants), 90-day surgical complications, 90-day femoral fractures, and overall complications. The effect of BMI on outcome was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Risk-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: BMI had a significant effect on overall complications (30-34 in kg/m2: OR 1.1, CI 1.0-1.2, P = .014; 35-39: OR 1.5, CI 1.3-1.6, P < .001; ≥40: OR 2.1, CI 1.9-2.3, P < .001; <30: reference). The OR for 1-year revision procedures (30-34: OR 1.2, CI 1.1-1.4, P = .001; 35-39: OR 1.6, CI 1.4-1.8, P < .001; ≥40: OR 2.4, CI 2.1-2.7, P < .001; <30: reference) and 90-day surgical complications increased with every BMI category. For mortality and periprosthetic fractures there was a higher risk only for patients with BMI ≥40. CONCLUSION: BMI increases the risk of revision rates in a liner trend. Therefore, the authors believe that patients with a BMI >40 kg/m2 should be sent to obesity medicine physicians in order to decrease the body weight prior elective surgery.

[Impact of Case Numbers on the 5-Year Survival Rate of Unicondylar Knee Replacements in Germany]. / Einfluss der Fallzahl pro Klinik auf die 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate des unikondylären Kniegelenkersatzes in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Reported survival rates of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) vary considerably. The influences of patient characteristics and the type of implant have already been examined. This analysis investigated the influence of hospital volume on 5-year-survival rate, using administrative claims data of Germany's largest health insurance provider. METHODS: We analysed administrative claims data for 20,946 UKAs covered by the German local healthcare funds (Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse, AOK) between 2006 and 2012. Survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The influence of hospital case numbers on 5-year survival was analysed by means of multivariable Cox regression adjusted for patient characteristics. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals for five hospital volume categories: < 12 cases, 13 - 24 cases, 25 - 52 cases, 53 - 104 cases, > 104 cases (per hospital and year). RESULTS: The overall 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 87.8% (95%-CI: 87.3 - 88.3%). This increased with hospital volume (< 12 cases: 84.1% vs. > 104 cases: 93.2%). The analysis identified low hospital volume as an independent risk factor for surgical revision (< 12 cases: HR = 2.13 [95%-CI 1.83 - 2.48]; 13 - 24 cases: HR = 1.94 [95%-CI: 1.67 - 2.25]; 25 - 52 cases: HR = 1.66 [95%-CI: 1.41 - 1.96]; 53 - 104 cases: HR = 1.51 [95%-CI: 1.28 - 1.77]; > 104 cases: reference category). DISCUSSION: Our analysis revealed a significant relationship between hospital case numbers and 5-year survival rate, which increases with hospital volume. The risk of surgical revision within 5 years in hospitals with fewer than 25 UKAs per year is approximately twice as high as in hospitals with more than 104 cases.

Are TKAs Performed in High-volume Hospitals Less Likely to Undergo Revision Than TKAs Performed in Low-volume Hospitals?

BACKGROUND: High-volume hospitals have achieved better outcomes for THAs and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). However, few studies have analyzed implant survival after primary TKA in high-volume centers. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Is the risk of revision surgery higher when receiving a TKA in a low-volume hospital than in a high-volume hospital? METHODS: Using nationwide billing data of the largest German healthcare insurer for inpatient hospital treatment, we identified 45,165 TKAs in 44,465 patients insured by Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse who had undergone knee replacement surgery between January 2012 and December 2012. Revision rates were calculated at 1 and 2 years in all knees. The hospital volume was calculated using volume quintiles of the number of all knee arthroplasties performed in each center. We used multiple logistic regression to model the odds of revision surgery as a function of hospital volume. Age, sex, 31 comorbidities, and variables for socioeconomic status were included as independent variables in the model. RESULTS: After controlling for socioeconomic factors, patient age, sex, and comorbidities, we found that having surgery in a high-volume hospital was associated with a decreased risk of having revision TKA within 2 years of the index procedure. The odds ratio for the 2-year revision was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.4-2.0; p < 0.001) for an annual hospital volume of 56 or fewer cases, 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.7; p < 0.001) for 57 to 93 cases, 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.3; p = 0.039) for 94 to 144 cases, and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.2; p = 0.319) for 145 to 251 cases compared with a hospital volume of 252 or more cases. CONCLUSIONS: We found a clear association of higher risk for revision surgery when undergoing a TKA in a hospital where less than 145 arthroplasties per year were performed. The study results could help practitioners to guide potential patients in hospitals that perform more TKAs to reduce the overall revision and complication rates. Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of a minimum hospital threshold of arthroplasty cases per year to get permission to perform an arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Five-Year Survival of 20,946 Unicondylar Knee Replacements and Patient Risk Factors for Failure: An Analysis of German Insurance Data.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in implant design and surgical technique of unicondylar knee arthroplasty have led to reduced revision rates, but patient selection seems to be crucial for success of such arthroplasties. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the 5-year implant survival rate of unicondylar knee replacements in Germany and to identify patient factors associated with an increased risk of revision, including >30 comorbid conditions. METHODS: Using nationwide billing data of the largest German health-care insurance for inpatient hospital treatment, we identified patients who underwent unicondylar knee arthroplasty between 2006 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with revision as the end point and log-rank tests were used to evaluate 5-year implant survival. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to determine factors associated with revision. The risk factors of age, sex, diagnosis, comorbidities, type of implant fixation, and hospital volume were analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 20,946 unicondylar knee arthroplasties were included. The number of unicondylar knee arthroplasties per year increased during the study period from 2,527 in 2006 to 4,036 in 2012. The median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range, 56 to 72 years), and 60.4% of patients were female. During the time evaluated, the 1-year revision rate decreased from 14.3% in 2006 to 8.7% in 2011. The 5-year survival rate was 87.8% (95% CI, 87.3% to 88.3%). Significant risk factors (p < 0.05) for unicondylar knee arthroplasty revision were younger age (the HR was 2.93 [95% CI, 2.48 to 3.46] for patient age of <55 years, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.58 to 2.19] for 55 to 64 years, and 1.52 [95% CI, 1.29 to 1.79] for 65 to 74 years; patient age of >74 years was used as the reference); female sex (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.29]); complicated diabetes (HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.12]); depression (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.57]); obesity, defined as a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.26]); and low-volume hospitals, denoted as an annual hospital volume of ≤10 cases (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.39 to 1.84]), 11 to 20 cases (HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.27 to 1.70]), and 21 to 40 cases (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.51]) (>40 cases was used as the reference). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from known risk factors, this study showed a significant negative influence of obesity, depression, and complicated diabetes on the 5-year unicondylar knee replacement survival rate. Surgical indications and preoperative patient counseling should consider these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Post-arthroscopic osteonecrosis of the medial tibial plateau: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis after arthroscopic surgery of the knee has already been published. The purpose of this article is to report on the frequently misdiagnosed entity of osteonecrosis of the medial tibial plateau. CASE PRESENTATION: Charts and radiographs of a consecutive series with isolated medial tibial plateau osteonecrosis were analyzed. The criterion for inclusion was the absence of trauma. Six caucasian female patients with an average age of 76.5 years complied with this criterion. Three of these cases had had arthroscopic intervention for medial meniscal lesion within the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of these necroses remains unclear. Osteonecrosis must be taken into account as a possible cause of persistent knee pain after surgery. Correlation between arthroscopic treatment and necrotic processes in the tibial plateau must still be regarded with skepticism.

Major acetabular defects treated with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage and impaction bone allograft in a large series: a 5- to 7- year follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: Major bone defects are the greatest challenge in hip revision arthroplasty. METHODS: In a prospective, consecutive nonrandomised study we followed up 74 patients with Type III (AAOS) acetabular bone defects who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with bone grafting and implantation of a Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cage (APC). The patients were examined pre- and postoperatively according to a standardised clinical and radiological protocol. No patient was lost to follow-up. RESULTS: 9 patients died before follow-up. In 9 other patients the APC was revised within the follow-up period. In 4 of these patients the revision was necessary because of aseptic loosening. In the remaining 5 cases joint infection, recurrent dislocation and 1 trauma were the reasons for revision. 56 patients were included in the statistical analysis. In the follow-up group the mean Harris Hip Score increased from 39.9 preoperatively to 73.2. 85% of the patients assessed their operation result as good or excellent. CONCLUSIONS: In a large consecutive series the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cage proved to be a valuable option in the treatment of major acetabular bone defects in hip revision surgery.